I ponder If your wording was intentional or when they simply meant to declare that buildings with enclosed mezzanines meeting XXX parameters are required to have two exits. The one situation I've browse exactly where it wasn't upheld was when somebody was Evidently attempting to use interjurisdictional immunity to skirt https://messiahxmqwz.nizarblog.com/38666555/helping-the-others-realize-the-advantages-of-mezzanine-barriers